🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a pending law that include decreasing the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, global health authorities raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” stated Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the legislation is approved.

The WHO in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for various offences “extending from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary states the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.