🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a growing group of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a useful starting point," said a leading MEP driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong evidence".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for minors," said a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the local level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures mandating guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, further states are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.